Cool, go use LLMs. Not sure why you’re expecting validation from me, I’ll never be impressed by your inability to handle basic tasks and attempt at delegating them to a predictive text generator. I can’t do anything about your choices, nor do I care about your lack of skill.
You went out of your way to tell someone that if they find llms used full it means they are stupid and not as good as you. But now that your argument doesn’t hold any water you don’t get to play the “you are expecting validation from me” card.
You have a superiority complex. Get over it and stop trying to tell other people how to live their lives just because you can’t use a hammer
If you are this bad at cominucating, no wonder you can’t use LLMs.
I’ve been told that things will make me stupid and are lack of skill my whole life, TV, videogames, computers, calculators, phones, social media yet everyone around me turned out just fine (I’m not using myself as a reference because that is a fallacy, you have to look at other people when talking about these things).
You are just a grumpy asshole who thinks highly of himself, and are not willing to even give it a proper chance. The whole point is not that they are perfect, but they take advantage of the P=NP idea. It’s way faster to check and fix code from an llm than it is to write it all (as long as it is a lot of code. you can’t generate line by line)
Go live under a rock, although I’m sure you will still make arguments about how your rock is better
Not to be a dick, but this reveals more about your own limitations than it does about the power of LLMs…
It just means you suck at prompting, which is basically just talking and explaining what you need
I suck at prompting? I didn’t write the dozens of papers showing the limitations of LLMs, my guy.
Two things can be true. They have limitations and are useful. Hammers have limitations too. It’s not their fault if you always miss the nail
Cool, go use LLMs. Not sure why you’re expecting validation from me, I’ll never be impressed by your inability to handle basic tasks and attempt at delegating them to a predictive text generator. I can’t do anything about your choices, nor do I care about your lack of skill.
You went out of your way to tell someone that if they find llms used full it means they are stupid and not as good as you. But now that your argument doesn’t hold any water you don’t get to play the “you are expecting validation from me” card.
You have a superiority complex. Get over it and stop trying to tell other people how to live their lives just because you can’t use a hammer
Yes.
That I did not say nor agree with.
Nothing you said disproved anything about “my argument” but sure.
If you are this bad at cominucating, no wonder you can’t use LLMs.
I’ve been told that things will make me stupid and are lack of skill my whole life, TV, videogames, computers, calculators, phones, social media yet everyone around me turned out just fine (I’m not using myself as a reference because that is a fallacy, you have to look at other people when talking about these things).
You are just a grumpy asshole who thinks highly of himself, and are not willing to even give it a proper chance. The whole point is not that they are perfect, but they take advantage of the P=NP idea. It’s way faster to check and fix code from an llm than it is to write it all (as long as it is a lot of code. you can’t generate line by line)
Go live under a rock, although I’m sure you will still make arguments about how your rock is better