• rodolfo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    since the general meaning of the post is trivial, which you tried to sum up with this

    different regulations lead to different outcomes

    all that remains that could be barely interesting are the names of those states.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It may be trivial, but we have to prove trivial statements often. Some people might claim regulations don’t protect the waterways and only harm businesses. They’d be wrong, but it’s still important to give counter-examples to them.

      • rodolfo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        god I’m talking about something completely different 😂😂😂 why did you move all of this to the article’s content? I swear, you answered so fast, it makes me think I’m writing to ai generated content. it may well be, since i wow post and not comment in my c9mment. il leave these like this just to see what happens

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I answered quickly because I fucked up my partition on my computer and while I’m fixing that (waiting for things to scan) I’ve got nothing better to do. My bad. I don’t understand what the rest of your comment says though.