Elon Musk has finally addressed reports that his name is included in a newly released batch of Epstein files.

Sharing a story from U.K. outlet Sky News, which ran with the simple headline “Elon Musk and Prince Andrew Named in the Latest Epstein Files Release,” the Tesla CEO fired off an enraged tweet.

“Shame on Sky News for this utterly misleading headline,” Musk wrote. “Anyone pushing this false narrative deserves complete contempt.”

“Epstein tried to get me to go to his island and I REFUSED,” Musk continued, “yet they name me even before Prince Andrew, who did visit.”

The “false narrative” in question is presumably Sky’s decision to float Musk’s name ahead of Andrew’s; the Daily Beast has reached out to Musk’s representatives for further clarification.

Musk’s name does indeed appear in the latest batch of documents released by Democrats on the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

“Reminder: Elon Musk to island Dec. 6 (is this still happening?)” reads a note found in a 2014 diary of the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The revelation comes from a fresh haul of previously unreleased material pertaining to the Epstein investigation, which has continued to dog the Trump administration.

Musk has previously said that he was invited to Epstein’s compound on Little St. James in the Virgin Islands several times, but claims he turned down the offers.

In a statement to Vanity Fair in 2019, just days after Epstein was arrested on federal sex trafficking charges, Musk confirmed that he had visited the disgraced financier’s Manhattan townhouse for about 30 minutes several years previously, but that “Epstein is obviously a creep.” He added, “He tried repeatedly to get me to visit his island. I declined.”

In an interview with the Department of Justice in August, British socialite and longtime Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence for sex trafficking, said she first met Musk in 2010 or 2011, during a multi-day stay on a Caribbean island for Google co-founder Sergey Brin’s birthday.

She also said she later saw Musk at an Oscars event, seemingly referring to a Vanity Fair Oscars party on March 2, 2014, where she and Musk were photographed together. The aspiring trillionaire has previously explained that image by saying he did not know Maxwell and that she had “photobombed” him.

Maxwell did not have any knowledge of a deeper relationship between Epstein and Musk, but believed emails between the two men were uncovered during discovery.

In June, Musk, the former head of the Department of Government Efficiency, fell out with his buddy President Donald Trump in spectacular fashion. At the height of their spat, Musk wrote in a now-deleted tweet that Trump “is in the Epstein files.” He has since retracted the statement and apologized, saying that he “went too far.”

Others named in the latest round of Epstein file disclosures include Musk’s former colleague and right-wing billionaire, Peter Thiel, and Trump’s former chief strategist, Steve Bannon.

Further documents are expected to be released as Congress prepares to vote on a bipartisan bill that would require full disclosure in the Epstein case.

  • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    By 2014 Epstein had been arrested so I knew what was going on there. Does that make me complicit in his crimes as well or does it mean I followed the news?

    • EightBitBlood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Depends on if you were invited to his island my dude. Were you?

      Because that’s the difference between you and Musk that very much indicates his guilt.

      You think those invites go out to people who DON’T know what’s happening on that island?

      If so, why did Musk decline the offer? Unless, you know, he knew what was happening there, and what the invite was for.

      Musk was INVITED to PEDO ISLAND. Full stop. That’s a fact. His excuse is that he “declined” to go.

      Which very much indicates he already knew what was happening there, at least ENOUGH TO RECIEVE AN INVITE that he has admitted to. His excuse further implies he knew more than that since he declined the invite. Why?

      Literally, what is his excuse for the declined invite?

      There is literally no single excuse that exists that doesnt indicate his guilt of at least knowing what was happening on that island and doing nothing about it.

      • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Musk was invited 6 years after Epstein’s first arrest. Again Musk could have known simply because it was in the news.

        Bannon, Windsor, and Thiel all went after the first trial.

        • EightBitBlood@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 minutes ago

          Cool. Do you understand the concept of an INVITATION? He was still INVITED there. WHY? What was that invite FOR?

          Fun in the sun?

          Innocent people do not suddenly receive an Invite to pedo party island.