First sentence is wrong:
Since 7 October 2023, Israel has waged a brutal war on Gaza
It was Hamas that invaded Israel on Oct 7th starting a brutal war they had no hope of winning, killing 65,000 civilians which they have admitted they are ok with dying for the publicity
Stopped after that, sounds like more left wing opinionated bullshit to me
LOL… this is a new argument I’ve been noticing more & more. It goes something like this… “Hamas made Israel commit a genocide.” If I was paying $7,000 per comment on social media, I’d be asking for a refund for such low effort Israeli propaganda.
“Jews started this when they blah blah blah…”
- Nazis justifying the Holocaust
I never read about Jews attacking and killing thousands of Germans, capturing and holding a portion of German territory, and kidnapping hundreds of civilians.
I never read that Israel represents all Jews, nor how opposing genocide is antisemitic. I’d strongly argue that a country committing genocide while claiming to represent all Jews are actually engaging in antisemitism, especially since those they are genociding are semitic people.
People like this want you conflate “the country of Israel” with “all ethnic/religious Jewish people everywhere”
It allows them to more easily call people antisemitic when you criticize the Israeli government.
Even IF Israeli intelligence hadn’t ignored reports of potential attacks, and even IF they hadn’t intentionally lowered security in order to make potential attacks worse, all in order to give them and excuse to do the thing they already wanted to do, committing genocide in response is a FULL FUCKING STOP “no”
I like how you casually claim Hamas held Israeli territory IN THE FRONTIER OF OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN LAND.
FFS. The Gaza Prison Breakout is analogous to the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising, a response to 75 years of ethnic cleansing and shooting children in the knees for sport, 16 years of illegal military land sea and air siege where Israel calculated the caloric input to keep Palestinians in Gaza on a “starvation plus” diet.
They was attempt that would seriously hurt civilians. If they succeded it wouldn’t justify the holocust ike the jewish resistance group Nakam who attempted to poison water supplies
The attacks, which were the first large-scale invasion of Israeli territory since the 1948 Arab–Israeli War, initiated the ongoing Gaza war.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_7_attacks
Go back to sleep or a pro-palestine rally, whichever is easier for you
what point do you think this proves? you think this genocide being part of a larger war initiated by the side committing the genocide makes it okay? because that’s how this reads. i do not endorse hamas or any of their actions, but that does not justify killing hundreds of civilians every day for 2 years. nothing does. and israel being a settler colonial project also does not in any way make this fine, that’s completely absurd
You’re leaving out the most pertinent details, their bruh:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakba
If you’re going to steal land & displace a million people, don’t be surprised when they revolt. The whole world sees Israel as the colonizing imperialists they’ve always been, and the colonizing monarchy that claimed back then Zionists could steal the land have ragrets.
I wish all I needed to tell me what to trust is a simple graph. According to that, I should be relying a lot more on CNN & NYT. If a majority of Americans don’t know at this point that MSM media outlets & politicians on both sides are highly influenced by the Israeli lobby, then they might as well start sending their taxpayer dollars to Israel themself.
Go back to reddit zionazi
How about you go back to Voat?
First sentence was correct. Your version sounds like more Zionist victim bullshit to me.
I’m like… that’s right, Israel didn’t just start their shit in 2023, they’ve been attacking Palestinians and assassinating Israelis who wanted anything else my whole life… but then I kept reading.
Fun fact: History did not start on October 7th.
Go back to reddit, troll.
There is no denying that Novara Media are left-wing, they proudly wear that badge. Is it possible to cover a war without opinion or an agenda?
First letter is wrong. Stopped reading after it was Zionazi genocide loving bullshit to me.
Israel did every crime hamas did on 7 of october. Israel stsrted the conflict by ethenic cleansing
Which is why the Germans just had to exterminate the jews. I mean, they burned down the Reichstag building, what were they supposed to do?
Stop hitting yourself. Stop hitting yourself.
Am I doing it right?
This whole site has strong bias and mixed facts see this link :
Bias Rating: FAR LEFT Factual Reporting: MIXED Country: United Kingdom MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE Media Type: Organization/Foundation Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic MBFC Credibility Rating: MEDIUM CREDIBILITY
Also , the BBC is deliberately being targeted of foreign disinformation and influence campaigns, particularly from state-sponsored actors seeking to discredit its reporting. Not saying they are perfect, but they are discredited by the Zino- Rizzian propaganda machine.
There is no denying that Novara Media has a left-wing bias, however is there any news outlet that has unbiased reporting of this conflict?
has a left-wing bias
So does reality.
But some people are, perplexingly, still concerned with “being fair”.
Yes… Democracy Now for example, but they’d probably be considered even more left for reporting the truth.
So what are you saying? all media is biased. so doesn’t matter?
I am saying that all media has a bias, but I am not saying that doesn’t matter. I’d argue that Novara Media is quite transparent about its bias.
Being transparent is better than lying about it
that Novara Media is quite transparent about its bias.
Had never heard of this site before, that’s why I checked.
Careful with these kind of bias or fact checkers, as they’re only relevant on the left/center/right axis, which is a biased framwork in and of itself. A centered position, which these checkers claim to be the least biased, are absolutely dependant on the Overton window and that window is currently so far off to the right, that any slightly leftist position might seem radical or even unthinkable.
It also only makes sense, if you are some kind of hyper centrist, absolutely ignoring what “right” and “left” actually mean and then proclaim that the center is a good thing and any extreme from the center perspective is a bad thing. That’s either willfully ignorant or a right-wing perspective trying to appease to unpolitical people.
This fact checker also proclaims mixed factual reporting in their summary, but in the segment it says “Failed Fact Checks: None in the Last 5 years”. This is dumb and misleading.
One can see this kind of bias by them branding “concern for climate change, and racial-social equality” as far-left perspectives, while a sane person would see these things as the fucking bare minimum. Everything less than that is de facto regressive and right-wing.
Many bbc journalists admit that bbc was biased towards Israel and use your brain instead of “factcheckers”
