• TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        None of these dipshits own their stupid useless pixel art either. They fell for a scam that doesn’t even have anything of potential use, unlike a timeshare, which you could actually potentially use. Not the burn op thought it was.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            Yes, it’s a one time waste of a large sum of money. Not entirely sure why that’s supposed to be better. Congratulations, you got a jpeg. Bet it was worth $15,000.

            • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              17 days ago

              You’re not sure why lifetime debt traps are worse than one time bad investments? Are you just trying to win an Internet argument at this point thinking I’m defending NFTs? Because yeah, a lifetime liability is generally worse for your average person.

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                17 days ago

                This is a bizarre exchange. You ARE defending NFTs and trying to get me to defend timeshares. Which are only superior in that they exist. Which is all I said.

                • lad@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  17 days ago

                  ‘X is an awful thing but it could be worse’ doesn’t really sound like defending X

                • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  17 days ago

                  Yeah but see, I’ve only commented on how bad timeshares are and how you don’t actually own anything. They’re both equally awful, as the op stated. You’re the one trying to carry water for their actual value which is largely none or worse negative.

                  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    17 days ago

                    …God I hate the Internet. No, I didn’t. Wouldn’t ever. Haven’t here. Would be a bizarre thing to do.

            • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              17 days ago

              No, but it’s baffling to me that folks don’t seem to understand that timeshares with recurring maintenance costs that can only be discharged by paying someone to take them or bankruptcy aren’t worse. If people aren’t careful you can die and the damn things might get inherited, continuing the extraction misery. They’re a whole different class of financial mistake.

              • vrek@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                17 days ago

                I remember going to a presentation trying to sell timeshares back in the 90s. I was on vacation with my parents in Orlando Florida. If we went to an hour long presentation selling us time shares we would be given tickets to Disney world for 3 days and up to 4 people per party.

                I have no idea how they afforded to do that, I know we didn’t buy one and I just read a book(i think I was about 10) while waiting to go to Disney world. We did get the tickets and Disney world was enjoyable.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      The two aren’t even remotely comparable. A timeshare may not be as valuable as you thought it was, but it exists and you can use it. An NFT is basically an entry in a star registry, but the people think (or at least thought) they actually own the stars.

      • baines@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        timeshares had knockon costs that kept on giving in some cases years

        for those NFTs were better

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          NFTs were bought with crypto, which had various hidden costs, scams and thefts, so it’s basically the same.

      • pruwyben@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        On the other hand, with an NFT you’ve just thrown your money down the toilet, while timeshares will keep charging you fees and are incredibly difficult to get out of (and the services that supposedly help people get out of them are often scams too).

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          True, but while you’re still paying those timeshare fees, you still have access to the place.

          The real difference is that a time share is never thought of as an investment where you buy low and sell high. It’s thought of as getting a good deal on something you plan to use. For it to be similar to an NFT it would have to be something like a dude in Nebraska buys a time share in Australia and then tries to make money from Australians or something. AFAIK almost everybody who buys time shares does it because they plan to use the place as a vacation property and actually do use it that way, at least for a while.