The 35% strategy: It is both electorally expedient and morally correct to ignore large chunks of public opinion | Chris Dillow

chrisdillow.substack.com

The 35% strategy: It is both electorally expedient and morally correct to ignore large chunks of public opinion | Chris Dillow

chrisdillow.substack.com

frankPodmore@slrpnk.netM to

UK Politics@feddit.ukEnglish · 4 months ago

The 35% strategy

chrisdillow.substack.com

It is both electorally expedient and morally correct to ignore large chunks of public opinion.

You must log in or # to comment.

Chat

UK Politics@feddit.uk

uk_politics@feddit.uk

Create a post

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !uk_politics@feddit.uk

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don’t post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think “reputable news source” needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

170 users / day
507 users / week
1.21K users / month
3.12K users / 6 months
1 local subscriber
5.68K subscribers
3.22K Posts
18K Comments
Modlog