• DarkThoughts@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Remember when a bunch of instances banned nsfwlemmy because they allegedly allowed pedo content, when in truth they just decided to not moderate fictional characters where the age was not obvious (like potentially 18, but plus / minus a couple years)?

    I think especially Lemmy.ml should rather focus more on cleaning up their Tankie & moderator issues instead of chasing ghosts, because that instance is a toxic cesspool of assholes and disinformation.

    • cacheson@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think especially Lemmy.ml should rather focus more on cleaning up their Tankie & moderator issues

      As much as I would love to see it, I don’t think the lead devs of lemmy, who own both lemmy.ml and lemmygrad.ml, are going to ban themselves.

        • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s how it was originally. They spun lemmygrad off to an entirely different serve because they made a halfhearted attempt at going mainstream, which seems to have lasted about 5 minutes