minnix@lemux.minnix.dev to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agoDo you think banning end-to-end encryption is plausible? Think again.github.comexternal-linkmessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1231arrow-down17cross-posted to: hackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1224arrow-down1external-linkDo you think banning end-to-end encryption is plausible? Think again.github.comminnix@lemux.minnix.dev to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square27fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@derp.foo
minus-squareumami_wasabi@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·2 years agoThey absolutely can. Its just the matter where to find a trusty guy to write one for them.
minus-squaredavel [he/him]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 years agoSome of them are useful idiots, and some of them are working with State security & intelligence, which want full-spectrum communication access.
minus-squareDeckweiss@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agohttps://balkaninsight.com/2023/09/25/who-benefits-inside-the-eus-fight-over-scanning-for-child-sex-content This independent report has been posted here a while ago. They seem to be smoking big US tech dollars.
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoOr they just use one of the hundreds already written?
They absolutely can. Its just the matter where to find a trusty guy to write one for them.
deleted by creator
That’s the point
Some of them are useful idiots, and some of them are working with State security & intelligence, which want full-spectrum communication access.
https://balkaninsight.com/2023/09/25/who-benefits-inside-the-eus-fight-over-scanning-for-child-sex-content
This independent report has been posted here a while ago. They seem to be smoking big US tech dollars.
Or they just use one of the hundreds already written?