ccunning@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 15 天前Would an LLM AI model trained wholly on consenting open source projects with a license requiring all derivative works be open source licensed still be problematic?message-squaremessage-square32linkfedilinkarrow-up159arrow-down15file-text
arrow-up154arrow-down1message-squareWould an LLM AI model trained wholly on consenting open source projects with a license requiring all derivative works be open source licensed still be problematic?ccunning@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 15 天前message-square32linkfedilinkfile-text
There would a lot of problems with the feasibility and enforceability of such a project, but putting that aside…
minus-squareSnailMagnitude@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down9·15 天前Breaking News: High failure rates reported in early stage Oldowan startups make millennials reconsider tool use. This just seems like anti-computer evangelism from the 1950’s and 1960’s, and anti internet stuff in the 90’s, being repurposed. I’m working with anti-Manichean attacks repurposing old anti-Marcionite attacks at the moment, same stuff. Bronze tooling is more than fine to get stuff done.
minus-squareSnoopSqueak@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down4·15 天前“AI” is more of a scam than a tool. We do not yet have artificial intelligence. At all. They only call it that to scam idiots.
minus-squareSnailMagnitude@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down2·15 天前It’s been an academic discipline since the 1950’s and a work in progress since at least Ada Lovelace. Calling AI a scam for idiots is fair enough: but please include writing, machines and computers there too. World class moron Linus Torvadls on the matter 14 July 2026: "AI is a tool, just like other tools we use. And it’s clearly a useful one. It may not have been that “clearly” even just a year ago, but it’s no longer in question today."***
minus-squareSnoopSqueak@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·edit-215 天前We have writing. We have machines. We have computers. We do not have AI.
minus-squareSnailMagnitude@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·15 天前We don’t have AI? What year are you posting from?
minus-squareSnoopSqueak@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·15 天前We have LLMs. We do not have artificial intelligence. They call it that, but it’s all marketing. It’s not remotely humanlike.
minus-squareSnailMagnitude@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down2·15 天前This sounds more like you have some kinda religious objection to a perfectly normal term in use for 100yrs or so. It’s not marketing, it’s the english language https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/artificial-intelligence With all due respect I’m not really sure your feelings on what constitutes humanlike matters much.
minus-squareSnoopSqueak@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·15 天前 With all due respect I’m not really sure your feelings on what constitutes humanlike matters much. Fuck you too, shitbag.
minus-squareSnoopSqueak@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·15 天前It is not a thinking machine. But it is advertised as an agent, a personal companion, etc. Companies take turns releasing “rogue” AI to fool people into believing it can think for itself.
Breaking News: High failure rates reported in early stage Oldowan startups make millennials reconsider tool use.
This just seems like anti-computer evangelism from the 1950’s and 1960’s, and anti internet stuff in the 90’s, being repurposed.
I’m working with anti-Manichean attacks repurposing old anti-Marcionite attacks at the moment, same stuff.
Bronze tooling is more than fine to get stuff done.
“AI” is more of a scam than a tool.
We do not yet have artificial intelligence. At all. They only call it that to scam idiots.
It’s been an academic discipline since the 1950’s and a work in progress since at least Ada Lovelace.
Calling AI a scam for idiots is fair enough: but please include writing, machines and computers there too.
World class moron Linus Torvadls on the matter 14 July 2026:
"AI is a tool, just like other tools we use. And it’s clearly a useful one.
It may not have been that “clearly” even just a year ago, but it’s no longer in question today."***
We have writing. We have machines. We have computers.
We do not have AI.
We don’t have AI?
What year are you posting from?
We have LLMs. We do not have artificial intelligence. They call it that, but it’s all marketing. It’s not remotely humanlike.
This sounds more like you have some kinda religious objection to a perfectly normal term in use for 100yrs or so.
It’s not marketing, it’s the english language https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/artificial-intelligence
With all due respect I’m not really sure your feelings on what constitutes humanlike matters much.
Fuck you too, shitbag.
It is not a thinking machine. But it is advertised as an agent, a personal companion, etc. Companies take turns releasing “rogue” AI to fool people into believing it can think for itself.