not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agorulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square12linkfedilinkarrow-up1277arrow-down15
arrow-up1272arrow-down1imagerulelemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square12linkfedilink
minus-square[object Object]@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28·2 months agoCommon misconception, nuclear is the heat source, steam is the result
minus-square𝙈𝙞𝙖@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 months agoSo a steam engine is actually a fire engine?
minus-squareMalgas@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 months agoThe technical term is “heat engine”, or sometimes “Carnot engine”. (Though the latter is more if you’re talking about the underlying theory than an actual device.)
Common misconception, nuclear is the heat source, steam is the result
So a steam engine is actually a fire engine?
The technical term is “heat engine”, or sometimes “Carnot engine”. (Though the latter is more if you’re talking about the underlying theory than an actual device.)