• pwnicholson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Exactly. Early Marvel was deeply about character and their depth and character flaws that made them interesting. Thor, Steve Rogers, Natasha Romanov, and especially Tony Stark were interesting and complex personalities. (Bruce Banner and Clint Barton…eh).

    The stories in recent Marvel products are fine. Mildly interesting serials. Ok popcorn fare.

    But the character development has been getting more and more lacking. Even Thor has been reduced to ‘dumb blonde’/‘dumb entitled rich kid’ gags.

    I think that’s part of what makes Loki one of the only really interesting outings for Marvel recently. He stayed reasonably conflicted and complex.

    • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The comics struggled with making Clint Barton interesting on his own for quite a while - the Matt Fraction Hawkeye series actually succeeded in making him interesting though, and I was rather disappointed when the MCU went a different route.

    • 0ops@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think Thor is actually more interesting of a character in his later movies, but other than that I pretty much agree with you