• the_q@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    So if you can’t afford traditional insurance which is 100% a scam then why is this a bad alternative?

    • thefloweracidic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      This isn’t a good alternative either. From reading the article it looks like this service is meant to screen less serious issues, and if those less serious issues need an in person doctor visit, you’ll need insurance.

      The deeper problem is that if our personal data is gold, our medical data is diamonds. It may not be tomorrow, or a decade from now, but I guarantee any sort of contact non-medical corporations make with our medical data will result in a darker dystopia.

      Targeted ads will be more invasive. Insurance premiums can be increased for “unhealthy” purchases. Medical coverage can be denied based on economic decisions. The list can go on. We would pretty much get a more perverse profit driven medical system if companies like Amazon start wiggling their way into medicine. Also regulations won’t keep us safe, you can thank lobbying for that.

    • Melpomene@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The service doesn’t cover most healthcare so you’re still stuck with One Medical’s bills, which (if reviews on Trustpilot are correct) tend to be higher than traditional medical. They still bill to your insurance if you have it.