PlogLod@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 1 year agoI get that AMP sites are supposed to load faster. But why do they have to be so ugly?message-squaremessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up143arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up137arrow-down1message-squareI get that AMP sites are supposed to load faster. But why do they have to be so ugly?PlogLod@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square24fedilinkfile-text
Or why do they need to change the appearance from the original version of the page at all? It just looks unaesthetic
minus-squarekadu@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 year agoIf we do NOT have a 46 component loading animation that loads TWO trackers and requires 20% GPU utilization I AM GOING TO PUKE, TEAM
No JavaScript? How dare you? 😱
If we do NOT have a 46 component loading animation that loads TWO trackers and requires 20% GPU utilization I AM GOING TO PUKE, TEAM