• jabjoe@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    They aren’t being civil to the Nazi. They aren’t conceding the table. They are furious at him for messing up the table.

    • User_4272894@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This metaphor falls down when you realize the table is in a restaurant owned by a Nazi, and the table by the window makes the restaurant look really popular.

      Refusing to concede the table is literally adding value to the Nazi owned table, and giving others cover to say “no we also hate Nazis; we’re just here because that table looks cool” which furthers the problem.

      • jabjoe@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        They are there because they were there before the Nazi bought the restaurant.

        I want them to leave to, and come to Mastadon and Lemmy, but they don’t see able to. I don’t think of them as Nazies because of it. They argue with the Nazies. They are just ignorant and not IT literate enough to move. Though I think there is wide acceptance that it’s getting more and more toxic there.

        • User_4272894@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh, shit, well as long as they got to the restaurant before the Nazi bought it, I guess there’s no harm in continuing to support it. Especially if they don’t have the technical knowledge to… Stop using a website?

          • jabjoe@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not sure you can say the are supporting it. They can’t use the other restaurants and can’t cook. There is probably a certain amount of denial they are dealing will full-on Nazies. Hard to see something when doing so means you have to act in a way very detrimental to your life.

            • User_4272894@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              For a service like Twitter, where user numbers define value, using it is 100% supporting it. Again, the metaphor falls apart because suggesting they can’t use other options suggests they might die, which is painfully untrue for the vast majority of Twitter users (literally no user in a developed country relies on Twitter for life/death information in a way other sources can’t provide).

              • jabjoe@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                There are plenty who twitter is their livelihood. Apparently they just can’t get the follower numbers on Mastadon (as well as struggle to use it). They are trapped. The magic invisible hand of the market is no substitute for regulation. You arguing consumer choice can solve this kind of problem and it clearly often can’t.