• Dkarma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m willing to believe that men hunted more frequently for this reason alone. Women are simply too valuable. I wonder if this is the origin of a dowry as well. Compensation for the tribe or family losing the ability to expand.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think you mean bride price. A dowry is something the woman’s family gives to the husband’s family.

      • ???@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not always. In Islamic tradition, the man pays the dowry (know in Arabic as mahr مهر) to the bride, who would then own the money herseöf (so not her family or tribe). It can be anything with monetary value, including lifestock or gold.

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Men were more expendable but the more important issue at hand was continued survival of the tribe. If we don’t have children we die out in 20-40 years. If we don’t have food, we die out in 2-4 weeks. If a woman was physically capable, she was likely going to be sent out on a hunt, more so if her family were hunters too.

    • Klear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re willing to believe that despite complete lack of any evidence for that?

      • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would never quote it as scientific fact without scientific evidence, but it does withstand some scrutiny. Hunting is dangerous.

        10 alive men + 5 alive women + 5 dead women = 0-5 babies

        10 alive women + 5 alive men + 5 dead men = 0-10 babies

        If that isn’t evolutionary pressure, I don’t know what is