The Republican-majority education board also objected to books portraying fossil fuel use in a less-than-positive light.
  • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    81·
    10 months ago

    Poorly written sentence. The very next paragraph states:

    The 15-member board largely rejected the books either because they included policy solutions for climate change or because they were produced by a company that has an Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) policy.

    • trash80@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      21·
      10 months ago

      That states the reasons for rejection were:

      1. they included policy solutions for climate change

      2. they were produced by a company that has an Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) policy

      The title of the post states that books were rejected for explaining climate change.