dantheclamman@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoAfter 151 years, Popular Science will no longer offer a magazinewww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1318arrow-down14 cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldhackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1314arrow-down1external-linkAfter 151 years, Popular Science will no longer offer a magazinewww.theverge.comdantheclamman@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square24fedilink cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldhackernews@derp.foo
minus-squarerockSlayer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up48·1 year agoSame with the history channel. It’s almost like the unrelenting pursuit of profit destroys interesting niches in the name of widespread appeal
minus-squareRadicalCandour@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down1·1 year agoAka your classic enshitification model.
minus-squarepiecat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 year agoHuh, that’s just enshitification with TV
minus-squarebillwashere@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoSeems like there’s a word for this……
Same with the history channel. It’s almost like the unrelenting pursuit of profit destroys interesting niches in the name of widespread appeal
Network decay, a common pattern.
Aka your classic enshitification model.
Huh, that’s just enshitification with TV
Seems like there’s a word for this……