Rapidcreek@reddthat.com to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agoAppeals court reinstates gag order that barred Trump from maligning court staff in NY fraud trialapnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square36fedilinkarrow-up1254arrow-down12cross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldpolitics@lemmy.world
arrow-up1252arrow-down1external-linkAppeals court reinstates gag order that barred Trump from maligning court staff in NY fraud trialapnews.comRapidcreek@reddthat.com to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square36fedilinkcross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldpolitics@lemmy.world
minus-squarejordanlund@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·1 year agoOh, it definitely tortures the definition of “sentence”. Split across 2 pages too!
minus-squarelolcatnip@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoI’m just gonna say it: it’s not a single sentence. It’s a series of malformed paragraphs each consisting of a sentence fragment. Or that’s what it is in English. I think legalese had different rules of grammar.
minus-squarelolcatnip@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoI’m just gonna say it: it’s not a single sentence. It’s a series of malformed paragraphs each consisting of a sentence fragment. Or that’s what it is in English. I think legalese had different rules of grammar.
Oh, it definitely tortures the definition of “sentence”. Split across 2 pages too!
I’m just gonna say it: it’s not a single sentence. It’s a series of malformed paragraphs each consisting of a sentence fragment.
Or that’s what it is in English. I think legalese had different rules of grammar.
I’m just gonna say it: it’s not a single sentence. It’s a series of malformed paragraphs each consisting of a sentence fragment.
Or that’s what it is in English. I think legalese had different rules of grammar.