The applicants made it clear the space wouldn’t be just for LGBTQ+ students. It would be for anyone who needs to “just breathe for a second,” said one of the students who confronted the adults Nov. 14.

The grant asks for just one thing — that they identify the sponsors, something that every grant does, one school board member reminded the room. In this case, it would be with one simple phrase anywhere in the space: “It Gets Better.”

  • Motavader@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I didn’t see any dissenting opinion in the article. I really can’t fathom what the could but up as a valid defense of this.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is hope indoctrination?

      “I don’t know where this started that it’s going to be indoctrination and talk about sexuality,” said Sharon Carter, one of only two school board members who voted in favor of the grant that night.

      • Motavader@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ooohh, ok, I misunderstood what you meant. I thought you were referring to one of the troglodytes who voted to reject the funds… that they had an opinion worth reading. Got it!

        • NeverNudeNo13@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          No no… this is the dissenting opinion I was referring to…

          “We as a board are making it more controversial than it has to be,” said board member Anthony Andrews, who complimented the kids for doing exactly what we want our young people to do: show leadership and initiative, identify problems and find solutions. “If we vote no on this, we send the message that we don’t trust the students."