“We recognize that, in the next four years, our decision may cause us to have an even more difficult time. But we believe that this will give us a chance to recalibrate, and the Democrats will have to consider whether they want our votes or not.”

That’s gotta be one of the strangest reasonings I’ve heard in a while.

  • Jonna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is pressure to make the Democrats better, whether by changing their stance or getting different Dems.

    Would you suggest accepting that the Democrats as they are is enough to stop climate change, end wealth inequality, provide housing and healthcare, end discrimination, reform the police, etc?

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Let me know how that works for you. You know after you lose the Senate and Presidency next year. Watch how fast the Supreme Court upholds a Muslim registration program over an issue of standing or by pointing out that the census already requests that information. Then we will get a second travel ban.

      You are voting against your own interests.

      • Jonna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Who says they aren’t voting Democrat when it comes down to it? They’re trying to improve their voting choice. Ffs.

    • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is how democracies die. Fascists don’t need a majority to win, they just need their opposition to be splintered. It’s exactly what happened in Hungary, and now it’s too late.

      You might want to think long and hard about how you triage your political decisions.