• mwguy@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    They is who?

    The die hard style terrorist you suggested in the previous comment.

    based on unconfirmed rumors (at the time) of the hospitals being used for weapon storage.

    They should have demanded the right to inspect the facilities because they were “unconfirmed” only because it made the Jews look good. A report like that coming from anywhere else by outlets like Reuters and the BBC would be seen as fact unless proven otherwise.

    MSF work in the environment that is available to them, wherever that is.

    There are plenty of places they could be where they’re not. They’ve hardly saturated the worldwide need for charity doctoring. A volunteer stationed in Palestine is one you can’t station in Ethiopia, Hati, etc…

    Every doctor in Palestine could be doing just as much good elsewhere in the world.

    Not operating there since 2007 would be taking a side, which, again, they don’t do. They treat patients.

    If they had refused to serve in military depots; Hamas would have either been forced to provision them a safe place to work. Ignoring your integrity is choosing a side too.

    and require a purity of apolitical stance that does not exist in a warzone, or even a stable democracy.

    Honestly, “don’t operate in a military installation” is hardly a purity test. Even in active wars the Red Cross will establish field hospitals that doctors like this could work out of and remain apolitical.