• S_204@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hol up. Lolololol.

    Are you saying that the rich fucks who are buying up housing stock will make them accessible to the houseless population of America?

    • Aleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So far they actually have nothing to say beyond “nuh uh you’re wrong”, which is effectively nothing at all. I’ve asked them to explain, we’ll see what we get.

    • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you saying that the rich fucks who are buying up housing stock will make them accessible to the houseless population of America?

      No, that’s not what I’m saying.

        • prole@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They don’t know. Look at their comment above, the book they recommended to everyone was “the basics of economics” or something.

          I really hope it’s a troll, because holy shit the narcissism it takes to read an Econ 100 level (if even that) book, and think you’re an expert on the subject. Wild.

      • S_204@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And please explain the economic theory behind your post. We have history as far back as the start of capitalism. It shows your post to be completely out of touch with reality. If you have proof evidence or a functioning theory of why your post would lead to Las vacancies and more accessible housing for people, I am very interested in seeing it.

        I’ve got a feeling though that you don’t have an adequate response or you would have posted it. So if you’re going to reply without a response, maybe all you need to do is post an apology…