• ivanafterall@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    Agreed it’s not that much in context. However, the article says 125 people, which means roughly everyone in attendance gave near the maximum legal limit for individual candidates.

    • Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Sticking to the legal limit, are they? If they’re not finding loopholes and shady backways to funnel her more money (as is the behavior I have come to expect) I have to assume that they aren’t actually all that invested.

      ETA: Not saying they AREN’T doing that still. I just haven’t heard about it (yet)

      • ivanafterall@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah, I just don’t think that’d be openly tallied in the article, by definition, in this context. From a formal political perspective, going to an event and having all 125 people give the maximum amount is baller. In the real-world, she’d better have those shady back-channels active, too. Trump raised $25 million in a day back in 2019.