• bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Maybe so. I think it’s more a matter of company owners having to educate themselves instead of playing God towards their employees.

    It’s becomes very evident when you look into psychological interactions in companies. It seems soo unnecessary - until you look at the results. Companies that actively work to prevent demotivating behaviour also produce better results at the bottom of their financial statements.

    Just similar to how violent behaviour resulted in people not working due to broken arms, demotivating behaviour stops employees from doing the job well. You can see it in the contemporary term “Silent quitting” which is a result of poor management. People do minimum work because they are only motivated to as they’re told and don’t get a say in how they do it.

    Firmly no. To your last sentence. Unions don’t just exist to push the price of labour. Unions exist because one man alone can easily be replaced with another poor shit worker.

    Unions exist because serious workers actually like doing their job well.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Firmly no. To your last sentence. Unions don’t just exist to push the price of labour. Unions exist because one man alone can easily be replaced with another poor shit worker.

      Which companies do because….

      It benefits them

      • bstix@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Only in the short term. It’s not sustainable against competitors who does otherwise.