• twistypencil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I think they were asking for actual green wins, policy or otherwise, not candidates who have run. I voted for Nader, fwiw, but I won’t be voting for stein

    • scarabine@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yeah. That’s basically it. Demonstration of ground level impact and commitment. It’s difficult to imagine trusting a group with a national bureaucracy when they haven’t shown that they’re capable of that scale of operation. Unfortunately that capability matters more than the ideals.

      Edit: but also it matters because it demonstrates the ideals in action in a tangible way.

    • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Californians have elected 55 of the 226 office-holding Greens nationwide. Other states with high numbers of Green elected officials include Pennsylvania (31), Wisconsin (23), Massachusetts (18) and Maine (17). Maine has the highest per capita number of Green elected officials in the country and the largest Green registration percentage with more than 29,273 Greens comprising 2.95% of the electorate as of November 2006.[68] Madison, Wisconsin is the city with the most Green elected officials (8), followed by Portland, Maine (7).

      You act like there has never been a Green politician that has won. Also, globally several Green Party members won some important elections in Europe.

      • twistypencil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        The question is not about elected NUMBERS.

        I’ve not been acting at all, I’ve just been trying to clarify the question. Don’t confuse the two, I’m not attacking you, I’m trying to help clarify the disconnect that is here.