• Benaaasaaas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s not really a ban it’s just a protection for other people’s personal freedoms, I for one would love to get freedom to not smoke in an outside cafe, yet others are choosing for me now.

    • ciwolsey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      When you smoke its not just your own health you ruin. It’s the same selfish thinking antivaxers have.

      • julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s not a terrible analogy, but doesn’t resounding support a ban. It’s virtually unimaginable (and I suspect more or less legally impossible) that vaccination would be obligatory.

          • julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yeah, what was legal/feasible 100 years ago might not be the best guide today. I mean no reasonable person would deny it would be better for public health.

            That’s actually an interesting question. All the people I know who still smoke are left leaning and probably pro vaccine. I guess I don’t know many of the main smoking population (older lower socioeconomic status) so maybe there there’s more than coincidental overlap. It would be coherent I guess for the freedom over everything type people I suppose, depressingly.