• Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      National order isnt based on tit for tat. If someone commits a war crime against you it doesnt mean you get to do it too.

      In my opinion the time of day they chose to blow them shows they wanted as much collateral damage as they could.

      What’s the advantage of making excuses for committing war crimes?

      • Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        At a certain point it stops being worth it. If sending a brainwashed 11 yo to blow up a checkpoint means you can no longer trust having any technology near you, your family and friends it might cause hesitation.

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Is there any time of day it’s not atrocious? Seems like any time would have basically equal risk for collateral casualties.

        To be effective it all had to be at once. It seems that they waited until the pagers were being used to coordinate a fresh wave of rocket attacks with promises of more to come before setting them off.

        • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Because that time of day is when the most people will be out in public. It seems deliberately designed to cause as much damage as widely as possible. Likely to cause fear in the population.

        • villainy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Is there any time of day it’s not atrocious? Seems like any time would have basically equal risk for collateral casualties.

          Then maybe it shouldn’t be done at all.

          • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            Maybe all an army has to do to take over the entire world is bring their families to the front. Can’t shoot back at them because their families are there. So they pretty much win every engagement. Problem solved. No more wars.

              • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                I wasn’t trying to say that at all. Wars are fought where they are fought. It’s up to whoever is in charge of the area to make sure they are evacuated.

                The people in charge of the area in Gaza (Hamas) do the opposite, that’s why they are designated as a terrorist organization and not legitimate government, such as the taliban in Afghanistan.

                An illegitimate, criminal organization, that so willfully disregard the public welfare and trust, has no right to fight anywhere.

                Let’s dispel the bullshit idea that Hamas is fighting for the lives and rights of the Gazan people. If Hamas wants to have a state so bad, they should start by looking out for the interests of their own people instead of constantly leading them into worse suffering. Taking part in international terrorism and killing Jews is more important to the leadership of Gaza then is feeding their people and until it’s not Gaza is irredenta.

                • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 hours ago

                  Where would the people evacuate to? Why is it always assumed thats a valid option?

                  I’m not condoning violence but all of these better options people listed have been tried over and over, and Palestinians were dieing long before October 7th.

                  Look up how many palestinian children the IDF killed in 2023 prior to the attack.

                  Tell me what’s the right answer when another group of people controls your life and kills your family members.

                  Israel has been just as if not more violent than Hamas, its bullshit to defend them. Defending themselves my ass, defenders don’t steal land.

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I would agree with this if they somehow only harmed Hezbollah severely. That was not the case.