Maven (famous)@lemmy.zip to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 6 days agoSquare!lemmy.zipimagemessage-square125fedilinkarrow-up1228arrow-down11
arrow-up1227arrow-down1imageSquare!lemmy.zipMaven (famous)@lemmy.zip to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 6 days agomessage-square125fedilink
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 days agoAlso pretty sure definition of a shape requires only one enclosed or contiguous area.
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·6 days agoThis one is enclosed and contiguous though, the lines of the triangle end where the circular line starts. (The rest is just a drafting residue.)
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·6 days agoNo, it is 2 contiguous regions. The line of separation is the bounding line of a “shape.” Otherwise, the entire whitespace outside of the region is also part of the shape, as is anything it touches.
minus-squareThreeme2189@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·6 days agoOK, imagine the space outside of the shape is black, or see through or whatever.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·edit-25 days agoWell then the line of separation means nothing and then you’ve lost two right angles to the contiguous void.
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 days agoThe angle of the triangle that protrudes into the circular part is not a right angle.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·5 days agoMy apologies you’re correct, you lose two right angles.
minus-squareThreeme2189@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·6 days agoWhy? Does a cube floating in the void not have angles?
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·6 days agoWithout a distinction of where the cube begins or ends it does not because there is no cube and there are no angles.
minus-squareThreeme2189@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·6 days agoThe cube begins where the void ends and ends where the void begins.
minus-squareStopJoiningWars@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·6 days agoI hope for you that you’re high.
minus-squareKlear@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-25 days agoFun fact - there are no actual cubes anywhere in the universe. All geometric shapes are an abstraction. There are no cubes and no angles, so that checks out.
Also pretty sure definition of a shape requires only one enclosed or contiguous area.
This one is enclosed and contiguous though, the lines of the triangle end where the circular line starts. (The rest is just a drafting residue.)
No, it is 2 contiguous regions. The line of separation is the bounding line of a “shape.”
Otherwise, the entire whitespace outside of the region is also part of the shape, as is anything it touches.
OK, imagine the space outside of the shape is black, or see through or whatever.
Well then the line of separation means nothing and then you’ve lost two right angles to the contiguous void.
The angle of the triangle that protrudes into the circular part is not a right angle.
My apologies you’re correct, you lose two right angles.
Why? Does a cube floating in the void not have angles?
Without a distinction of where the cube begins or ends it does not because there is no cube and there are no angles.
The cube begins where the void ends and ends where the void begins.
I hope for you that you’re high.
Fun fact - there are no actual cubes anywhere in the universe. All geometric shapes are an abstraction. There are no cubes and no angles, so that checks out.
Ceci n’est pas une cube.