• JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I’m confused, how can a company that’s gained numerous advantages from being non-profit just switch to a for-profit model? Weren’t a lot of the advantages (like access to data and scraping) given with the stipulation that it’s for a non-profit? This sounds like it should be illegal to my brain

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’m confused, how can a company that’s gained numerous advantages from being non-profit just switch to a for-profit model

      Money

    • FatCrab@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Their non-profit status had nothing to do with the legality of their training data acquisition methods. Some of it was still legal and some of it was still illegal (torrenting a bunch of books off a piracy site).

    • berno@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Careful you’re making too much sense here and overlapping with Elmo’s view on the subject

      • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Money doesn’t have any advantages in other countries? When did that happen?

            • affiliate@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 minutes ago

              the person that you’re replying to said something that’s true about the USA. they didn’t say anything about other countries.

              for another example, i can say “if you’re in the USA, then the current year is 2024” and that statement will be true. it is also true in every other country (for the moment), but that’s besides the point.