taken from boardgames@sopuli.xyz

  • Brokkr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 month ago

    They were very careful in how they worded the request. They are not asking for people to change their voting behavior, only to create a plan, and to make some public statements.

    Obviously, the latter part is fine but the voting plan doesn’t require that someone actually change their behavior. They are definitely skirting the line, but I’m sure they had the help of a lawyer when they made this.

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      We’re trying to pay tens of thousands of swing-state non-voters… enough to actually swing the election.

      I think their intentions here is what is most damning.

      • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 month ago

        Disagree, people spend money with the intention of influencing the outcome of elections all the time, that’s all campaign ads and canvasses and phone banks and etc. are

        And they’re not paying people to vote - they’re paying people to make a plan to vote (and make an apology and send a tweet, but I think those are irrelevant), which is something that campaign volunteers talk about with potential voters all the time