It’s like in a music video when the artist suddenly pulls out the new Samsung explosive device, and your heart sinks a little.

Not only is it necessary for even decent movies to be packaged within some IP, they also seem to rely on selling ad space within the movie itself.

Very bleak.

  • GCostanzaStepOnMe@feddit.deOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yes?

    Edit: Even if you want to be reductive and consider the entire movie as just a big brand advertisment, this doesn’t make sense. Does Burger King subsidize their commercials by running Samsung Ads within them?

    Edit2: This is probably a bad retort, see my other comments for clarification.

        • FoxBJK@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I understand your point, but a movie that is itself a 2-hour advertisement doesn’t lose any of its value by showing other brands.

          What’s bleak is that a movie about a toy grosses over a billion at the box office. Not that BMW or Samsung want you to look at their stuff.

          • GCostanzaStepOnMe@feddit.deOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            This critique irks me for some reason. Consider this: Imagine the latest Top Gun had some scene where Tom Cruise literally high fives Uncle Sam, then slowly whispers “Freedom” and winks into the camera. You’d rightfully find this jarring, a poor aesthetic choice, weird.

            But then someone online tells you why you’d expect anything else from a franchise that’s heavily subsidized and supported by the military industrial complex, and demanding a sort of artistic consistency from such a franchise is pointless to begin with.

            Tldr: I think you can critique the art even if you’re aware of it’s ideological confines.

            (This reply hinges on such a scene not being in the latest Top Gun movie, which I haven’t see yet to be honest)

            • Gaybees@artemis.camp
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              It might not be as obvious as literally winking into the camera, but Top Gun had substantial monetary investment from the U.S. military, and they definitely tried to make being in the military look cool and fun and attractive.

              They definitely don’t show what it’s really like to be a service member, and that’s for good reason.

              • GCostanzaStepOnMe@feddit.deOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah that’s kind of my point. Even knowing it’s partial propaganda, you’d know when something is “off”. Just like even knowing that Barbie is partially a branding campaign, You know how the car comercial scene is “off”.