Move follows US president Joe Biden’s agreement to supply similar American long range Atacms weapon

Britain is expected to supply Storm Shadow missiles for use by Ukraine on targets inside Russia, now that the US president, Joe Biden, has agreed to do the same for the similar American long-range Atacms weapon.

Keir Starmer, the prime minister, said at the G20 summit that the UK recognised it needed to “double down” on its support for Ukraine, while diplomatic sources briefed they expected other European countries to follow the US lead.

…

Russia, however, accused the west of escalation and said that Biden risked adding “fuel to the fire” in Ukraine, and while Donald Trump remained silent on the issue, his son Don Jr accused the military industrial complex of wanting to get “world war three going”.

Storm Shadow missiles have a range of about 250km (155 miles), similar to the US Atacms, and have in the past been given to Kyiv by the UK and France to strike targets inside Ukraine’s internationally recognised borders.

But the US retained an effective veto on their use because it supplies a guidance system and repeated lobbying by the UK had failed to shift the US position, which has only begun to soften after the election victory of Donald Trump earlier this month.

…

Ukraine had also become increasingly exasperated with Britain on the issue of long-range missiles, complaining earlier this month that not only had there been no progress on their use inside Russia but that the UK had stopped supplying them at all.

    • Destide@feddit.ukEnglish
      111·
      2 days ago

      People in power grew up being teased with it, guess they want to see the fireworks before they pop off.

    • C A B B A G E@feddit.ukEnglish
      34·
      3 days ago

      I mean, they just want to sell missiles and make that moolah. It’s the man in Moscow who keeps threatening nuclear winter…

      • Ram_The_Manparts [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
        184·
        3 days ago

        Maybe we should meet “the man in Moscow” (as if this has anything to do with one specific individual lol) in the middle then, and avoid us all getting vaporized.

        Wold be nice.

        • C A B B A G E@feddit.ukEnglish
          41·
          2 days ago

          I mean, I’m being facetious, it’s obviously shitty that people are being fed into a meat grinder, but from where I’m sitting it seems like Ukraine is being used as a fertile market for armements and whoever makes up the bunch I charge of Russia’s nukes are using them as an attempt to stop interference in their efforts to annexe a neighbour.

          What’s the chapo traphouse/ML take on this?

          • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
            142·
            2 days ago

            You’re mostly correct except Russia obviously doesn’t want to annex Ukraine, only the majority Russian parts that have been treated as second class citizens by Ukraine’s nazi government. If they annexed all of it, they’d only create larger problems for themselves in the borders with NATO members; keeping Ukraine neutral is the whole point (and is beneficial for everyone except arms dealers as you pointed out)

            • MarxMadness@lemmygrad.mlEnglish
              31·
              2 days ago

              It’s also worth remembering Russia’s position in the peace talks that started immediately after the war began:

              Few now remember that the war almost ended before it got going. On February 24, 2022, Russia launched ground and air attacks on Ukraine on four fronts. On February 28, 2022, Russian and Ukrainian officials came together in Gomel, Belarus, to start to negotiate peace. Peace talks continued intermittently for a month before being called off…

              According to a New York Times analysis of the 2022 negotiations later that year… Russia demanded Ukrainian recognition of its annexation of Crimea in 2014, permanent Ukrainian neutrality, and autonomy for the ethnic Russian provinces, or oblasts, in eastern and southeastern Ukraine.

              Russia never wanted to annex Ukraine wholesale. It didn’t even want any new territory.

              What tanked these talks was not the Ukranian government, but their NATO puppetmasters:

              An even bigger obstacle to further talks may have been the arrival in Kyiv on April 6 of British Prime Minister Boris Johnson. According to Davyd Arakhhamia, Ukraine’s chief negotiator at Istanbul, “Johnson brought two simple messages to Kyiv. The first is that Putin is a war criminal; he should be pressured, not negotiated with. And the second is that even if Ukraine is ready to sign some agreements on guarantees with Putin, they [the NATO powers] are not.” Three days after Johnson returned home Putin announced publicly that talks with Ukraine “had reached a dead end.” For his part, Johnson promised Zelensky $130 million of military equipment and $500 million kin financial aid, while President Biden announced a $800 million military package to Ukraine.

            • CascadeOfLight [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
              141·
              2 days ago
              Furthermore, here's a very interesting series of maps:

              Percentage of the population that are native Russian speakers.

              Support for Yanukovich, the president overthrown in 2014 and replaced by a government that immediately banned the use of Russian in offical documents and schools.

              Support for Volodomir Zelenski - or Vladimir Zelensky, as he would have been known in his first language, Russian - who ran against the coup leader on a platform of reconciliation with the separatist areas, right up until he won and someone with Hitler tattoos and a big gun explained his situation to him.

              And last but not least, a map of Russia’s early warning RADAR system, which you may notice a slice of eastern Ukraine sits neatly under, making it the ideal launch point for a decapitation strike against Moscow.

              So “annexing a neighbour” is trivially not what Russia wants, or is even capable of achieving. They want a demilitarized, denazified zone encompassing their most vulnerable border, a totally reasonable desire for any state, especially one facing down the lying, bloodthirsty savages of NATO. It will grab the areas of Russian speakers that it’s actually possible to assimilate, bringing the territory under their internal security arrangements, and leave the majority-Ukrainian-speaking areas that would be impossible to control to some sort of Kiev-run rump state.

              • C A B B A G E@feddit.ukEnglish
                6·
                2 days ago

                Thanks for actually explaining your position - I’m annoyed it got nixed because I actually wanted to read it properly!

              • MarxMadness@lemmygrad.mlEnglish
                32·
                2 days ago

                They want a demilitarized, denazified zone encompassing their most vulnerable border, a totally reasonable desire for any state, especially one facing down the lying, bloodthirsty savages of NATO.

                And this was promised to Russia upon the breakup of thr Soviet Union – Ukraine’s constitution calls it something like a “permanently neutral state.”

                Then, after 20 years of NATO pushing east (and destroying countries like Yugoslavia and Libya), the U.S. backs a color revolution in Ukraine in 2014. Next you start hearing talks of Ukraine joining NATO and Russian speakers in Eastern Ukraine start getting attacked. Then Ukraine breaks the Minsk agreements (those same ones Angela Merkel admitted were a stall tactic to arm Ukraine for this very war).

                You can disagree over whether this approaching hostility is justification for an invasion (the U.S. certainly would think so; it invaded Cuba over far less), but there’s really no argument that evil Putler just woke up one day and decided to do a land grab for reasons.

      • AmericaDelendaEst [comrade/them]@hexbear.netEnglish
        104·
        2 days ago

        You’re a fucking moron, and whatever mod wants to remove this again do me a favor and ban me if this shithole is so full of liberalism

        “Brigading” literally could you cry harder

        • C A B B A G E@feddit.ukEnglish
          5·
          2 days ago

          Come on mods - it’s fine for people to disagree/discuss/whatever.

          Maybe I’m a moron and maybe this person is a tactless tankie.

          I actually appreciated that there’s some actual fucking discussion here.

          • GreatAlbatross@feddit.ukMEnglish
            5·
            2 days ago

            We try.
            So far, we’ve not defederated from hexbear.
            When we have a thread that’s 50% comments from another instance, upvoted solely by that instance, it’s shit.