• gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    We do not, simple as, because it’s not

    That wouldn’t magically change the death rate, though, which was my point, don’t change the subject. If you’re not smart enough to understand basic math I’m not sure we should even pretend to respect your opinions on things more complicated than that, like basic science

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Science points to a foetus being a life- whether or not we value that life is a philosophical, moral and ethical issue. Biological, Physical and Chemical science isn’t the answer to everything.

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Science points to a foetus being a life

        No, science absolutely does not point to a fetus being “a life”

        Biological, Physical and Chemical science isn’t the answer to everything.

        True, but when you clearly don’t understand them at all (as you proved with your laughable statement in that very comment) then you also don’t have the answer, as they’re relevant to the discussion

          • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            21 minutes ago

            fetus, it’s weird that you insist on the incorrect spelling

            Something having cells does not make it “a life”, or else cancer cells are equally as alive as you and I and also can’t be removed without that being murder