fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 days agomoms rulemander.xyzimagemessage-square91fedilinkarrow-up1981arrow-down114
arrow-up1967arrow-down1imagemoms rulemander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square91fedilink
minus-squareIllecors@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoThis assumes a single child per set of parents, doesn’t it?
minus-squareSkunkWorkz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-24 days agoNo I’m talking about the amount of ancestors in the 80th generation back not the total amount of ancestors. It doesn’t matter how many children each set of parents had for that number.
This assumes a single child per set of parents, doesn’t it?
No I’m talking about the amount of ancestors in the 80th generation back not the total amount of ancestors. It doesn’t matter how many children each set of parents had for that number.