• JasSmith@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    If communism devolves into authoritarianism every time it is attempted, I don’t see the practical distinction.

    • Deceptichum@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      How many times has capitalism become dictatorships or fascists? Yet we continue to do it.

      Not to mention all those attempts have died in the socialism phase, because surprise surprise consolidation of power doesn’t lead to it being distributed.

      • JasSmith@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        How many times has capitalism become dictatorships or fascists?

        A handful of times. Most capitalist nations are not authoritarian. Purely by the numbers, it has a much better track record. Of course, “it’s not real capitalism/communism” always derails this discussion.

        I think you outline why communism inevitably fails. Marx advocated for violent revolution to overthrow the “bourgeois” democracy. The moment democracy is gone, the strong take and retain power. This is why, no matter the system, democracy must be the bottom line. It ensures that power is distributed. It’s not perfect, but it’s much better than the alternatives.

        • Deceptichum@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          It turns out it’s every time as we’re seeing with late-stage capitalism. Purely by the numbers it’s like 17 times vs 300 and of those 17 they were in a cold war with half the world. And that’s not even the same argument? It’s not up for debate that these were socialist countries, fuck the second S in USSR is for socialist.

          And once again that’s a miss. You’re conflating capitalism with democracy, that’s not the same thing at all. You can have democratic or authoritarian capitalist or socialist countries.

          • JasSmith@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            It turns out it’s every time as we’re seeing with late-stage capitalism.

            I’m sorry I don’t understand what you’re arguing. Are you claiming that all Western nations are authoritarian? I emphatically disagree.

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Why do overwhelming popular policies, like drug reform and universal healthcare, fail time and time again, while overwhelmingly unpopular policies, like tax cuts for the rich, easily succeed time and time again? Capitalism inevitably becomes thinly-veiled bourgeoisie authoritarianism. “Vote with your dollars” means those with the most dollars have the most votes.

    • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      You act as if it’s been tried any amount of time that would be statistically significant. Sometimes it’s not even communism other than in name and folks still count it.

      And it doesn’t devolve into it. It’s simply always been done at the same time. When you have essentially a dictatorship, absolute power will corrupt absolutely.

      A practical distinction historically speaking, but not philosophically speaking. If you’re unable to differentiate between concepts in history, I don’t know how you can ever effectively discuss them objectively. Though, this should have been evident with your comment initially. Communism doesn’t devolve into authoritarianism. They’re not even the same types of philosophies. One is about governing and one is about commerce. It’s like claiming capitalism devolves into a plutocracy. It does help to produce a plutocracy, but it didn’t devolve into one. They’re not the same thing.

    • spacesweedkid27 @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is a difference between theory and execution.

      Communism doesn’t even have to mean that there has to be a state for example.

      Communism is a group of ideologies and not automatically Stalinism or State Capitalism like in China.

    • Lordbaum@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      These are some societys which are at least socialist and some of them on the way to communism If you want to simplify it heavily: the means have to mark the ends ergo you can’t use the state to destroy the state (communism describes a stateless moneyless and classless society)