• thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 years ago

        Did you really just call a 90 year old woman who was in the Senate for 31 years a “revolving door”

        • SandbagTiara2816@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 years ago

          It might help, but not in isolation, imo. I think there is value to both having new people with new ideas as well as having people with knowledge of how institutions work. If you have entirely new representatives every term, then everyone is learning things anew (from the corporate lobbyists who are their same jobs for every legislative session). If we did away with private money in politics and publicly funded campaigns, then I think the case for strict term limits is stronger

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      This had been implemented in some places, and it’s only caused corruption to go up and the quality of politicians to go down. Term limits aren’t the silver bullet we need, they’re actually bad.

    • Neve8028@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      I’m for term limits but one term is a bit short. Like with any job, it takes some time to really learn the way the system works and to be effective in the position.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.worldBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      We limited the presidency to two terms. As a thought experiment, do you think Trump could have beaten Obama?

      • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Nope. I also don’t think trump could have beaten clinton prior to Obama. I think trump was a reaction to Obama.