So the trick to getting away with doing shit like this is to just be open about it? Weird. If that was the case, then why not give these Democrats a pass, as well? They aren’t exactly hiding it either.
Or are you just getting these four mixed up with the 200 others that didn’t support this legislation?
I’m fine calling out the 2% of Democrats that vote against their own constituents interests. But what I find hilarious, is the total lack of focus on the fact that 100% of Republicans are behind this.
This is what Chomsky was talking about when he wrote manufacturing consent. The framing here is massively deceptive, to the point of being completely backwards…and folks just eat it up this way. They swallow this narrative whole, and spit it back up for others to swallow.
So, even more evidence of insider trading? Too bad they cut funding to all the agencies responsible for dealing with this kind of corruption.
I love how they never once mention in the article that Republicans wrote the bill, proposed it, and 100% of them voted in favor of it.
But, despite all that…the headline still reads, “Democrats passed it”.
Just smash. It will be satisfying.
Consumers are the victims here. No one actually cares about their “feelings”.
Good thing he defunded all those regulatory agencies, then. /s
You wash all your dinner dishes before you go to bed.
The radiation spreads backwards in time. /s
That is a rather apt description.
So, Greenlanders…is this your price? A one-time $10k pay-off, to purchase your loyalty to the King of America?
I’m going with 5G towers. That makes the most sense. /s
Smartest person to put in charge of education.
Isn’t the US currently threatening to annex a certain Danish territory…by force? Could someone explain like I’m 5, how this makes any sense?
I love how they just casually admit that they’re “exploring ways” to break the law.
There’s a big difference between someone putting in a good word for you…and having them “pull strings” to get you the job. If all he did was get you an interview and you took care of the rest, it’s fine. But if he has actual “pull” with the company…meaning, they have to do what he tells them to…then there might be some resentment among your coworkers.
First time I saw one, I was a kid riding shotgun in my uncle’s pickup truck. We were driving pretty fast down this old logging road, on our way out to cut some firewood at an old clearcut site.
All of a sudden there was this big brown wall of fur right outside my window. I couldn’t even tell what it was until my uncle gently slowed down to let it pass us. The thing’s shoulder was just higher than the top of the truck, and it was running just as fast as us, when it came out of the bush and started running along beside us. Its antlers were almost as wide as the truck was.
We just kept slowing down to give him some space, and it just kept going at full speed until he disappeared around a bend. I didn’t even have time to be scared…just in shock at how massive it was. It nearly broke my brain.
My uncle just said something like, “Holy shit, that was close! That would have destroyed my truck if we hit him.”
As long as it’s peer reviewed, this is fine. If they want to try and pass off faulty research as if it were valid, then all they’re going to do is embarrass themselves.
The Constitution does not support that school of thought. It is very clear, that the rights it affords are universal and apply to everyone in the country. It says nothing about being a citizen or not.
He is the most healthy human being in all of history. No one is healthier or stronger than Donald Trump. He has the body of a 30 year old athlete and the mind of a genius.