Collatz_problem [comrade/them]

No, most people in 1903 lived not that much differently from the Medieval times. Urbanization was still low then. An average person from 1969 would adapt to 2025 much faster then an average person from 1903 to 1969.

This is until you do multivariate functions. Then you get for f(x(t), y(t)) this: df/dt = df/dx * dx/dt + df/dy * dy/dt

This is good actually, because it will reduce the brain drain of other countries. Critical support for JDPON Don.

The Holy Alliance is back (but as a farce)!

Even capitalism tries to evolve to crab

Bears usually avoid humans, unless very hungry, because those who didn’t avoid us, didn’t tend to live very long.

The Eend

You are horrified at our intending to do away with private property. But in your existing society, private property is already done away with for nine-tenths of the population; its existence for the few is solely due to its non-existence in the hands of those nine-tenths. You reproach us, therefore, with intending to do away with a form of property, the necessary condition for whose existence is the non-existence of any property for the immense majority of society.

In one word, you reproach us with intending to do away with your property. Precisely so; that is just what we intend.

But in a democracy the voters choose what they want, whether you like their choice or not.

The problem is who controls the choices they get.

The first entry in the logs you assemble to discover the lead up to disaster:

Consistency of an axiomatic system that contains arithmetic can be proven in this system if and only if it is inconsistent.

Americans are not flirting with Nazism. They dated it, married it and had many children with it.

Pelevin was satirizing 90s’ Russia and its emerging capitalist culture and his critiques still stand, because Putin’s Russia is just less fucked up version of 90s’ Russia. Trying to reduce his works to “satires of authoritarianism” is extreme cherry-picking.

Competition is won by those who extract profit now. Those who refrain from profiting even if they want to preserve the ability to profit in the future for whatever reason lose competition and are removed from making decisions. So only the most shortsighted capitalists remain.

Being able to extract profit is more important to individual capitalist than maintaining the system in the long run. See: climate change.

https://www.lmfdb.org/ for people deep into analytic number theory rabbit hole.

Genets are bad example, because Viverridae are the closest relatives to Felidae. Convergent evolution would be better illustrated by fish and dolphins.

They are mined, actually, although production fell during the war.

Shrikes are cute.