Also, even if it was permanent, it would still be something like a permanently_removed
set to TRUE
in a database. License keys probably are one of those things no company truly ever deletes from their records.
Also, even if it was permanent, it would still be something like a permanently_removed
set to TRUE
in a database. License keys probably are one of those things no company truly ever deletes from their records.
Unity does it
so to get AI generated CSAM…it had to have been fed some amount of CSAM
No actually, it can combine concepts that aren’t present together in the dataset. Does it know what a child looks like? Does it know what porn looks like? Then it can generate child porn without having ever had CSAM in its dataset. See the corn dog comment as an argument
Edit: corn dog
If you hash in the browser it means you don’t salt your hash. You should absolutely salt your hash, not doing so makes your hashes very little better than plaintext.
Because then that means you don’t salt your hashes, or that you distribute your salt to the browser for the hash. That’s bad.
Sounds like DNS blocking. Use DoH, won’t be as good as a VPN but it will stop the sniffing which allows them to block domains
Lmao it’s having a stroke
That’s because “firefox” (or “chrome” too) on apple products is just a reskin of Safari. Apple does not allow 3rd party browser engines in its app store.
That’s because 3rd party browser engines might not suck ass, which would allow OWA apps in your browser whcih would circumvent Apple’s 30% cut on everything. So they kneecap their own browser and don’t allow any other browser on their devices.
“They will text me why I should pick up”
It is larger than the US but conservatives fighting climate change measures is a global problem
The plagiarism case hbomberguy exposed is about a good production channel with millions of subscribers in collab with other larges channels
It’s not really about giving a shit, but when you’re used to no ads, then seeing ads is an inconvenience. And that’s usually even more potent than people giving a shit or not
I wouldn’t call this a step in the tight direction. A call for a step yeah, but it’s not actually a step until something is actually done
Well evidently the answer to your last question is " some people". Your point would only make sense if all this was hypothetical
Public outrage more often drives justice for public figures than what law enforcement does on its own. The level of control you’re asking for would simply nuke the press.
How would you possibly enforce that, or prevent people from just copying publicly available pictures for nefarious usage
deleted by creator
That is entirely not untrue. This is pure anti-china propaganda that is very easily verifiable.
The earliest examples of COVID were found by Zhang Jixian and the hospital alerted in 27th of December. This was communicated to the WHO the 31st of December after a larger amount of cases were identified (Source: official WHO publication). The timeline is abundantly clear
There are some traces of COVID that date back to November 2019 in China, but that is also true in Europe so that’s hardly a proof of Chinese maliciousness.
We were told lies about how China didn’t warn us because our politicians – I’m saying that as an European but that’s true of the US as well – ostensibly refused to hear China’s warnings for weeks before we started seeing cases skyrocket. So their choice was to either take responsibility, or blame someone else. China is both the origin country of the disease and a political enemy, so it was the easiest target.
Film a high res screen projection then
Who cares, it is an act of terrorism