• 51 Posts
  • 43 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 22nd, 2025

help-circle

  • The money is gone, because the FCC gave it to private companies. Unless the FCC stops giving grants to private companies, people will have to deal with spotty, unreliable internet that is overpriced. It was very much given to private companies (such as Comcast, Time Warner, and now SpaceX) in much more massive quantities than public fiber. There is definitely at least some “instead of”.

    I didn’t say there weren’t legitimate uses, but fiber is more often a better solution and it doesn’t fall out of the sky in an unsustainable way. Once the fiber is there, it’s there, and unlike LEO satellites, it can be repaired. It also doesn’t create an ungodly amount of pollution every time they need to lay some more, no where near as much.

    I’d be curious to know what the astronomical use you’re thinking of is.

    They can’t always filter it out. A lot of times the satellite tracks are RIGHT in front of what they’re observing. If it weren’t a problem, why are astronomers speaking out about it? Space telescope time is priceless, and it takes years to even get the chance to have a window of time where you’re able to use it. Have you ever seen how booked up they are? Saying they have satellite options only serves to minimize the actual problem to those that have no idea what that looks like.

    The point isn’t that there are more internet users than astronomers. The point is that we had a better solution, most of the grants for that solution were given to private companies, and now one of the private companies (owned by a nazi billionaire fuck) is exploiting that for financial gain, while astronomers are catching strays. The point, in the end, is that SpaceX, like other private companies, should have never been given a grant from the FCC, especially when the nazi owner is one of the richest people on the planet.






















  • I’m not sure a single Reddit comment is the best source, but I do appreciate that it contains an external link. For example, though, this article (from the same author that the commenter links) goes into it a little bit more visually for a BDXL M-disc from verbatim: https://goughlui.com/2024/10/21/experimenting-with-bdxl-part-1-the-media/

    The disc did have the same ID, but it looked different visually compared to Verbatim’s standard BD-R. The author stated that they can’t be sure either way because of this discrepancy. Keep in mind that it’s the same author that the commenter linked to, and the author says that their original article is often misinterpreted.

    Even if they are Verbatim’s standard discs, which no one has been able to prove conclusively, they are still MABL HTL discs, as that’s what Verbatim uses in all of their BD-R regardless.

    Further, the comment you linked is also at least somewhat BS. They claim that the BD-R M Discs have always been the standard BD-Rs. Meanwhile, there have been several durability tests of BD-R vs M-discs before the substrate change (remember, by their claim these should have been the same from the start) that have the standard BD-Rs die much more quickly than the M-discs. Such as this: http://www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/mag/indexmag.html?http://www.microscopy-uk.org.uk/mag/artsep16/mol-mdisc-review.html

    That comment is at least half wrong, because that would not be possible if they were the same from the start.

    Your original claim was that they are now organic. That is what I’m pushing back on, because they are still (and always have been) MABL. Do you have anything showing that they use organic dyes?


  • I think the conclusion that a lot of people in the DH spheres came to is that it seemed to be a change of inorganic material, not necessarily starting to use organic dyes. This change reduced their lifetimes from 1,000 years (with the OG millennia disc) to a few hundred. This would be in the ballpark for high quality MABL discs, which are still inorganic. It’s true that the substrate changed, but that didn’t make the substrate organic. Your link does not say that they changed to organic dyes, it only mentions organic dyes being the most commonly used and why M-Discs were originally made.

    Realistically, I only need my backups to last 50 or so years, and I’m not updating them frequently enough for it to become a hassle. I think as long as you’re following the 3-2-1 rule (or 4-3-2) for important data, these can’t hurt to have as a part of that solution, and that it’s likely that they’ll last at least 50 years.