

I would put good money on them being rural properties with historically low value, given this is all over an expansion project.
But what’s still clear is that you have zero understanding of wealth.
I would put good money on them being rural properties with historically low value, given this is all over an expansion project.
But what’s still clear is that you have zero understanding of wealth.
Having an expensive home doesn’t mean you’re rich.
You could have a mortgage on it, could have bought it when it was cheaper, which itself can be a problem with taxes and rates, or inherited it.
People can find themselves locked into an expensive property, or are in a position where it would be stupid to sell.
Yet again people on Lemmy demonstrate that they don’t comprehend wealth in the slightest.
None of these homes are outrageous for a skilled tradesmen to own. If you track wages and inflation this is what middle class looked like in the 70’s.
The rich occupy a completely different economic strata to these home owners. You have zero clue.
I wouldn’t call 77 years of genocide unprovoked
Their cookies notice is absolutely fucked. Morons.
Yes because that’s how it works legally.
You seem to have some issue comprehending this.
You seem very fixated on ICE as a talking point.
I don’t particularly care what ICE agents are doing as I’m not from the USA and have no desire to go there.
You seem to think innocent until proven guilty is some sort of belief in factual innocence, which it isn’t. It’s the withholding of judgment until due process is performed.
Like I said. Innocent until proven guilty.
I doubt you can make a convincing argument against the presumption of innocence as it underpins the best legal systems in the world but give it a shot if you want.
Innocent until proven guilty.
A revolutionary, a terrorist and an innocent man walk into a bar… stop me if you’ve heard this one before.
What a loser, going to the USA like that.
It would never come to piracy because the US would initiate regime changes, flatten militaries if they refuse to coup their governments and take the oil fields.
The whole thing is like some child considered oil supplies for the first time and believes there aren’t plans in place.
Hint: every developed nation has strategic oil reserves and is ready to go to war if supply is cut.
War happens, and countries will get flattened within weeks by a coalition.
Most countries maintain strategic oil reserves in the event of war.
It’s like you believe you’re the first person ever to consider what happens if oil supply is interrupted.
Bombing Israel for violating a ceasefire would be unbelievably based but it won’t happen
The US is an oil exporter, as it produces more than it uses.
No one can cut off the US oil supply. Not to mention they could simply seize oil haulers for themselves with their navy.
Your scenario is entirely unfounded.
Ahh yes the anti-Imperialist Russia, what are they up to at the moment? Surely not executing an imperialist land grab?
Show me a single military that doesn’t punish dissenting soldiers.
See Japan for example of where sufficient violence was used, the cycle did not continue.
People fear unintended consequences too much when it comes to the eradication of mosquitoes.
It’s an expansion project. I guess that’s one way to tell me you can’t read.