What?
That helps, actually. TY
weeeeee!
The heck is a dudechick?
Privately owned US companies that make massive profits off the capitalist system, like Stanford, obviously might not describe these things in an entirely honest way. The first definition of communism is almost correct, but the second is a common misinterpretation of communist theory.
The people who solidified communism as a political theory made a pretty clear distinction between private and personal property, as well as what they thought of landlords. Renting requires someone to own the means of production and lend it out to someone at a profit, which goes against the very foundations of communist theory.
Communism isn’t “the government takes all your stuff and divides it equally among people” either. I suggest reading some theory. Marxists.org is a good place to start https://www.marxists.org/subject/students/index.htm
Which one? You’re not describing any form of communism. You’re at best describing neoliberal capitalism.
That is not what communism is lmao
Commies are the only ones who ever successfully did anything about them
Renting and subscription services are very much capitalism.
There’s a reason commies hate landlords.
I’m the same with Nintendos new controllers.
➕ and ➖ are Start and Select to me.
Microsoft: advertises to increase profits like a good capitalist
People: “Is this communism?”
A scary drug like paracetamol
Shut up it’s comfy! 😭