I appreciate that you’re signal boosting “weird” but I think this is full-on “shitty”.
I appreciate that you’re signal boosting “weird” but I think this is full-on “shitty”.
https://pluralistic.net/2023/01/21/potemkin-ai/
Enshittification. Once you learn it, you see it everywhere. It’s depressing.
It says, “The, Bart, the.”
I’m not a lawyer but I’m not sure how liable you’d be. People run bots all the time. Plus, this is all about numbers. You can’t sue thousands of people like that.
Ooh, that’s nice. Now change “omnivorous” to “targeted” and things get interesting.
Thanks, friend!
I was just wondering about a general privacy goal of having an LLM bot just flood the zone with random data to try and confound advertising models, simulating clicks and likes/engagement across the spectrum just to wreck any meaningful data correlations.
If you were aiming this concept at two specific targets, i.e., costing the Trump campaign money and screwing with their data, things could get really interesting. Like an open source bot that would coordinate bizarre trends across large cohorts of users to convince the data miners that, for example, a disproportionate number of voters in key regions are demographically or behaviorally skewed.
Oops. Her. I was thinking of a DIFFERENT vile extremist troll. Sigh.
Are anyone else’s comments showing up twice?
Are anyone else’s comments showing up twice?
Look, I think it’s important to state here that while you can often offer prompts to strangers with no ill effect, 7% of strangers are DEATHLY ALLERGIC to prompts. I know it’s fun to give your strangers prompts sometimes, but I urge you all NOT to give prompts to strangers or you run the very real risk of harming them seriously.
Signed, A strangerologist
Dividing them between what, which cabinet position to give her?
Edit: wrong bigot
And Trump is still a big ol’ cock
Trump’s campaign manager, using Trump’s phone: “yes this is definitely Donald Trump bigly president please cancel my appointment of debate thank you bye”
I mean to qualify as “falsely”, which is stronger than “baselessly”. I don’t doubt your position, I’m just appreciating that a media outlet is calling out falsehoods clearly without using softened terms.
Nope, just tipsy.
Downvoted article, upvoted you.
Voting with my… uh, votes.
I would assume step 1 is to call out Cloudflare for abetting criminal activity and if they refuse to stop serving Xitter in Brazil, then they too are crassly flouting Brazilian national law and should be banned from the country as well. It would be a brutal showdown, but one would hope that losing ALL OF BRAZIL might hurt the margins enough to make them reconsider.