Fedegenerate

I appreciate this isn’t an AMA, I don’t expect an answer. But, beyond rashes are there any other ill effects?

The imperial boomerang

Our foreign policies are coming home.

Just respect animal’s personal space. Gesture that you would like to pet them, they’re not _that dumb, they either move into the pets or move away, accept the answer.

Sure. If you actively turn it on, and all involved know it’s on. But this is always active as far as I’m aware.

I’m guessing it’ll be toggle off, and it’ll toggle itself back on every update.

In other words, they’re taking your data for their use all the time, and sometimes they’ll share your data with you.

I’m sure there’s more than a little Baader-Meinhof happening. I did expand my privacy a bit; pihole, searxng, some other stuff and I notice it less now. Or I think I do, humans are notoriously bad at this.

Honestly, I thought they already did that.

One of my motivations for becoming more privacy minded, was the amount of times a subject of conversation was delivered through an algorithm later.

It was creepy, talk about hose pipes> receive hosepipe content/ads.

You can tell he’s no threat to the establishment by how the establishment treats him. If he were a threat, we wouldn’t be hearing this ‘king of the north’ stuff.

That’s fair. I’m much happier voting for Greens, less hand wringing, more sleep, that sort of thing. I couldn’t imaging having the support of genocide on my conscience, I support it via taxes… But voting for it? Then theres the anti-privacy, the anti-LGBT, the Mandleson thing…

I can’t remember the moment I chose not to vote labour, it could have been when he told people to leave. I do remember, very specifically, not wanting to support Starmer though, a good call I think. There’s a reason Starmer got fewer votes than Corbyn: we knew.

It could be the Guardian manufacturing consent for Burnham. Or, they could be talking with Labour MPs off the record. Sure, Starmer hasn’t announced anything, but anyone who know, KNOWS.

I don’t really know where I land on The Guardian, they’re mostly factual so probably the latter. Do they have a wealthy owner, for whom Burnham is particularly advantagous, to justify manufacturing the consent?

He announced his resignation, it was probably the latter

Steven Hartley has a Lemmy account? Jack Denny maybe?

A hosting service for games. Feed it games and it allows you to download them from your server, manage saves, emulate in browser… A bunch of stuff. It’s a good project.

Dopamine management system

Ah well, allow me to subvert that suggestion.

Expressly and unequivocally, threesomes are not something I particularly talk about when talking to bi/pan people.

Certainly not any more than anyone else. It isn’t something I voluntarily suggest we do, it’s not something I expressly ask about. Some of my friends have had threesomes, and some of those are bi/pan. So it’s not something I’ve not talked about, it’s just not the first thing that comes to mind.

I don’t really know how guy unicorns are targeted? Are they? I’ve only heard of the term unicorn being applied to women. But, I’m adjacent to the space at best.

Has cucking, becoming more fashionable, increased couples targeting bulls the same way unicorns are? As in toxically.

I suppose it’s different, a unicorn is expected to attended to both partners equally. Whereas, a bull isn’t really.

This is both off topic, and a Wendy’s. I don’t expect an answer.

I didn’t think the /s was necessary… I thought the “we like your vibe” was cliche unicorn hunter speak. I even used the word ‘unicorn’.

Anyways I fully agree, hence how I framed it. I fully apologise if I came off as anything other than tongue in cheek.

Is there a, err, nsfw instance? Asking, like, for a friend.

I learned long ago whether someone told me they were pan or bi, it took absolutely zero effort on my part to accept and agree with them.

Sure you’re bi/pan, but are you a unicorn, because my fiancée and I really like your vibe.

Let me get my robe, and wizard hat real quick.

Flesh and Code had the name ‘Daniel Todd’ repeatedly coming up in whatever model Replika uses.

Me: here’s what would convince me otherwise. You can provide it at anytime, and I’ll change my opinion.

You: How can I convince you it s dumb ?

Awfully, glass house you’re in.

Anyways:

You have shown you do not care about discrimination based on ethnicity. You have shown you do not care about deadly weapons. You have shown your ‘just one is enough’ was empty grandstanding, or worse targeted against Sikhs. You do not care about political murders. You are incapable of discussing anything in good faith.

Or you can keep running defence for the epstein. Class. I’m gonna be honest. This was only productive to show just how disingenuous you are, that’s done now. Then it was a little entertaining, but now you’re boring.

You’re going to have to either provide some data to change my opinion, or be more entertaining if you want my attention again.

You enjoy your outrage, stay mad. I think I’m going to try donate to a Langer. I know ‘data’ was a long word for you, so I provided a link.

Do they take cash donations? They do! You could be big mad, or feed some people. I’m not affiliated with this one, nor will I donate to this one, nor do I reccomend donating to this one. I’ll pick a local one, you should too. Other Langars are available.