2000s: Actually, fish aren’t fish
https://www.sciencealert.com/actually-there-is-no-such-thing-as-a-fish-say-cladists
- 0 Posts
- 586 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: August 10th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
3·1 day ago“we towed it outside the environment”
20·4 days agothen why the fuck is this newsworthy? ugh. Why is there such a huge hateboner for firefox lately?
modern cpus has an energy density on par with nuclear power plant cores.
they need cooling, money cant break physics.
19·12 days agofun fact, the RFC introducing NAT calls it a “short-term solution”
3·13 days agofair point, but to get there you must go to the comments to begin with, which I believe might be less likely you do when you don’t have something to say.
on the other hand, there is generally not much to discuss if you have an agreeing position. right?
11·14 days ago“no true scotsman”
481·14 days agotell me one food that isn’t made of chemicals
wow why is this getting downvotes for admitting a mistake?
0·23 days agoSorry for being a dick but it
Just stop then.
Between people on the internets lack of good grammar and common courtesy, the first one is a far smaller problem in my eyes.
I believe you got that backwards
Cans and glass are infinitely recyclable. Recycling aluminum saves 96% of the energy of producing new.
oh wow thats much better than I thought!
Sadly, recycling isn’t as effective as one might think. For example, only a small subset of the plastic you put in the plastic recycling bin will actually be recycled.
Does this mean you shouldn’t bother? No, but it gives all the more reason to try to use less plastic to begin with.
Did you even read the text you shared? It just says he left mozilla.
we use language in different contexts. In the food store “fruit” has one meaning, while in a botany paper, it has another.
This doesn’t say theres no such thing as fish generally, it says there is no useful definition for it in a biological setting.