I too like to partake into cynical sarcastic self loathing , at times.
And I do like the layered ambiguity to whom your comment is addressed.
I too like to partake into cynical sarcastic self loathing , at times.
And I do like the layered ambiguity to whom your comment is addressed.
Sounds like you just want an snswer.
Well, I’m not a brain surgeon. So, I don’t take myself as qualified to make that risk assessment. I agree that all you said up to ‘without consent’ is a very reasonable starting point to think about it, the answer to it should be made by whomever is qualified to answer it.
As for consent, no pacirnt gives direct consent to who’s in/helping the surgery besides the head surgeon. Why do you claim its need in this case?
I don’t understand either if this is even a problem.
Thank you for your comment. It realy helped me decide on the clickbaiteness of the posted link.
This comment, above, does not provide any context to the news linked.
It is the same thing.
It is explained in the link.
A hint, just after the title: “MIT engineers and collaborators developed a solar-powered device that avoids salt-clogging issues of other designs.”
UnFortunately, dude still has rights, regardless of how many times he breaks the law, or makes a mockery of it.
How would you find all the places where the same link is shared? Is it an easy tabulation to construct? (I don’t think it is)
Also, how would you deal with a link that is discussed as a different subject in different communities?
Hmmm…
I think I can see where that took you.
On this subject, the shallowness of your thoughts is only matched by the authoritative way in which you express them.
Can I suggest you to allow yourself to be left your thoughts to think it over.
Thanks for the thoughtful answer!