I’ve never thought about this exactly, but I bet there are a lot of planets with 30 month years when compared to Earth’s orbit of the sun.

Really what they want is a way to narrow down candidates at the end of the day.

The unfortunate part is that these methods are often the things that actually prevent diverse workforces.

Recruiting from expensive ivy league schools rather than state schools guarantees that you end up with a similar ethnic and gender make-up as those schools.

It doesn’t guarantee that you’re getting more qualified or harder working candidates.

Usually something as simple as getting your recruiters to focus their efforts elsewhere is what will increase your company’s diversity, without having to change any other aspect of your hiring process.

She matched with him knowing full well who he is and that he’s in her class, though, so it’s kind of on her.

Maybe that’s why he didn’t win the science fair?

Just do meth. It’s a lot less work and likely just as healthy.

How: with lubricant and patience.

Why: because it supposedly feels good.

I personally haven’t tried sounding but I do have a 0g Prince Albert, so I always have a reasonably thick piece of metal in there at the tip and it’s not a big deal.

Google sounding porn and find out!

Bold of you to assume I had zero safety incidents…

Gay men, since cleaning out takes a lot of time.

Now you’re thinking!

It needs meatballs.

Just like a cat. You get it a treat but all it wants to do is sit in the box!

Cartoonists!

Yeah, geocities was great!

Just in time for Christmas in July.

They said this:

The point is that that ultra-processed or unhealthy foods increase the risk for depression in the general public.

The study we are talking about literally says this:

Despite extensive data linking ultraprocessed foods (UPF; ie, energy-dense, palatable, and ready-to-eat items) with human disease,4 evidence examining the association between UPF consumption and depression is scant.

We are talking about a study that in its opening paragraph, with sources, contradicts what they, as a random internet stranger claiming to be a medical professional, are claiming as the truth.

I, for one, am going to side with the study over the person making claims with no evidence. Even a study that I think will cause people like you and the other person to act in foolish, unscientific, and very harmful ways.

Anyway, you should go back to reddit with that attitude. Or downvote and move on. You added nothing of value here and were a jerk for absolutely no reason.

Hello purple mug!

The statement they made, which I quoted, IS NOT BASED ON DECADES OF RESEARCH! It is based on their assumptions and the headline in this article.

The study we are talking about makes it very clear in its first paragraph that there has been little-to-no prior research on the effects of processed foods and depression.

Despite extensive data linking ultraprocessed foods (UPF; ie, energy-dense, palatable, and ready-to-eat items) with human disease,4 evidence examining the association between UPF consumption and depression is scant.

It is literally the justification for this specific study having been done at all.

This study only involved middle-aged white women (95% of participants) who didn’t suffer from depression at the start of the study. It measured incident depression over the course of 15 years and correlated that with various processed food categories.

That person making the statement that processed foods increase the chance of depression in the general public is doing exactly what I was trying to get people to not do, which is turn this headline into false assumptions and unhelpful advice about general depression.

I hate these reddit moments.

Then go edit your post to remove the statement that contradicts what you’re saying now.

What I am trying to do is to prevent people from reading the headline and making the false statement that you then made based off of it and using that to try and give advice about diet and exercise to people with clinical depression.

The point is that that ultra-processed or unhealthy foods increase the risk for depression in the general public.

This is you, making a false statement that is about the study OP posted, not general “not arguable” bodies of knowledge.

This is harmful, not helpful.

Edit: for those downvoting me, the quote from the person before me is NOT based on decades of non arguable research. It is only based on their opinions, biases, and the headline OP posted.

The study we are discussing opening paragraph says the following:

Despite extensive data linking ultraprocessed foods (UPF; ie, energy-dense, palatable, and ready-to-eat items) with human disease,4 evidence examining the association between UPF consumption and depression is scant.

Unless this random internet person knows more than these researchers, then I’d say that this person is doing the exact harmful thing I was trying to prevent.