In that case it wouldn’t be piracy.

What about in this case?

Why do people like video games?

It always seemed like a kiddie hobby that’s not meant to be taken seriously, but apparently a bunch of people in their 20s and 30s take it very seriously.

Yeah, PC gamers bent the knee to Steam decades ago at this point. This isn’t exactly a brand new issue.

Because myself and my kids like Mario Kart?

Because I like my OG Switch and this is a pretty massive improvement over that console?

On the plus side, the virtue signalers saved $ and can spend it on something that’ll bring them more joy and is hopefully more aligned with their views. And gives them practice and a mindset of “I’m the kind of person willing to boycott” for any other boycotts that might have a real effect someday.

It’s not really a boycott if you never really planned on buying the product. Otherwise, I’m technically boycotting Apple and Ford. Because I don’t buy Apply products and I don’t buy Ford cars.

When I say “please” and “thank you” I’m essentially just virtue signaling that I’m willing to play nice…

Those are specific actions you are taking in being kind and nice towards another person in reality. However, if you were to make a comment on Lemmy about how kind of a person you are because you claim you say “please” and “thank you” all the time, then that would be virtue signaling, because making claims about what you do or care about on social media is relatively meaningless without the specific actions being taken outside of that context.

So, in this case, talking about how evil Nintendo is for pricing a game at $80, what does that do exactly? Why should anyone else listen or care about someone expressing that opinion? Are you joining activist groups and spending time or money pushing for laws/politicians/etc to enact change to fight back against these actions? If so, then that’s not virtue signaling. But I’m unconvinced most people expressing these opinions and upvoting/downvoting posts and comments are doing anything beyond exactly that.

Of all the things in my life to worry about. Nintendo pricing and other issues barely move the needle.

And if they did, it would be hard to game at all because every company has at least a few “practices” that you can point to as making them “bad”.

It’s not really about boycotts not working.

It’s that a handful of people virtue signaling about how bad X game/company is on niche social media communities don’t matter if their opinions aren’t aligned with your average person.

Most people just enjoy games as a hobby and treat it the same way they treat picking something to watch on Netflix.

What I don’t understand is why do developers make bad games? They should just make good games instead.

Gamers want good games, not bad games.

Its funny in this case because not “fucking it up” effectively means making a movie that’s barely related to the game outside of the basic setting.

Or you could always just not play the game? It’s that not an option?

Yup, at the end of the day, the community just wants content that glazes the games/devs they like and hates on the games/devs they don’t.

Doing anything else is going to make a lot of the community upset

Wow. I actually did back this way back in the day and I swear I completely forgot about it for at least the last couple years until this post.

Yeah, thankfully with PC gaming there are no large corporations involved.

The lack of price drops aren’t really caused by tariffs up to this point.

Tariffs will be responsible for price increases however.

Man, development times are getting pretty crazy at this point. Hard to believe that we are starting to see decades between sequels to titles as a normal thing in the high end of the market.

It’s no wonder more games are aiming for games-as-a-service style models.

Steam is actually pretty decent, by company standards.

They aren’t doing this because they are decent. It’s because they were getting reamed on fees through people choosing the arbitration. I believe it was a law firm basically encouraging people to request arbitration because they would get paid every time a claim was submitted, regardless of the outcome.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/column-mass-arbitration-target-valve-accuses-law-firm-litigation-funder-2023-12-08/

Isn’t that foam what we are discovered is leeching into ground-water supplies everywhere and is super unhealthy for everyone?

I can’t believe anyone would approve it to begin with…

The main reason it didn’t face as much resistance is how far behind Sony (and IMO Nintendo) Microsoft is in this console generation. And the merger was still really close to not happening at all despite there being no chance that it turns MS into anything resembling a monopoly.

And since AB isn’t really a platform in the same way Microsoft/Sony/Nintendo are it’s not as though it’s directly reducing competition in that market.

And blocking the merger also benefits the market leader in the space.

And MS is a US company, while Sony isn’t (which matters in the context of the FTC).

I would argue it is silly, regardless of the explanation. Every culture has silly things, but that doesn’t make them somehow not silly.

Can’t believe this actually happened.