Almost a chuckle
Almost a chuckle
I must be old - it’s WordPerfect to me.
I’m fairly certain it is only anonymous “on paper”. Behind closed doors, they know where it came from and what is expected in return.
So, it sounds like this isn’t expected behaviour? Now that I’ve gone looking for examples, I can’t find any. Maybe there was some temporary problems yesterday…
Where do you live that Antarctica is “up”?
Once an end-to-end, encrypted, connection is established between a pair of peers then anything can be sent through it. The establishment proces is generally facilitated by a server of some description so neither peer needs to allow inbound connections. (I’m a long, long way from being an expert on this and happy to be corrected - but this seems like network fundamentals?)
I thought I was doing well with 8 down and 20 up! In my defence - a lot of the stuff I’m seeding is old (10+ years) and I’m the only seed.
It’s a 3 way tie between Back in Black, Led Zeppelin II and Wish You Were Here.
On a Commodore64?
It made me think much harder than I should really admit
I have some background in tech but admit I’m a long way out of touch now. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if they’re working on back end stuff to have personalised ads “baked in”. I know the resource implications of this are huge, but it still wouldn’t surprise me.
I was expecting this comment :-) I do actually do the laundry and she complains that I don’t use softener.
I wish I could make my wife understand this :-(
Yep. I’d rather not have a propane stove, but I live in an area with a lot of power outages. We have a propane generator for backup power. Makes no sense to size to generator to run and induction stove when we can just use our, properly installed, propane stove.
That’s kinda where I’m at, but I already have kids, and now they’re having kids. I worry about them.
I must have a pretty warped sense of humour… haven’t had a good laugh like that in ages.
I can’t understand how someone hasn’t explained to them that it’s impossible to enforce. I can only see two possible ways:
Require every social media platform operating in Australia to do rigorous ID checks on all users to ensure no-one is under the legal age, or
Somehow lock down the whole Australian internet so that users must login and then validate the identity, and therefore age, of all users. Then maintain a huge filter table to restrict under age users from social media.
Both of these are clearly never going to happen. Have I missed a simpler way to do it?