Reposting easily attainable public information is not “doxing”
Criticizing someone’s political views is perfectly reasonable
If you were acting in good faith and truly believed what you were saying then you would not have reposted the “doxing” information
Lemmy and Piefed are much more 1:1 reddit replacements. Mbin is it’s own thing, which is very high quality, but has less out of the box appeal to someone looking for “fediverse reddit”.
Bluesky isnt decentralized
But if it’s open source what is stopping them from simply creating another bluesky like yesterday?
Jay Graber’s background before BlueSky is in Web3 so take that information how you will.
My bad, I’m not an expert here but it’s weird that it’s open source and yet nobody else can have a bluesky? Like could I download that code and make a bluesky for everyone? If so why has nobody else done it? why is there only one for profit bluesky?
To answer your question though, no nothing has changed.
It’s still for profit, not federated and closed source so honestly I don’t know why it’s being discussed here
What’s going on? Why does this offtopic comment have 14 upvotes and no upvotes?
EDIT: Dead internet theory here in full force. This post is about Lemmy. The only thing that has to do with Substack is the example post that OP highlighted to demonstrate issues with Lemmy federation. And yet the top comment (and replies to my comment) is going on as if this post is about Substack, almost as if it was written by a technology that cannot understand context.
lil guy is doing his best 😂
k sry
It’s pretty great lol
If they had gone with my plan of 24 seasons of 24 episodes each then there would have been plenty of room for both!
It’s an objectively better plan I don’t understand why they didn’t listen to me
That alt text is just TOO real
Ohhh I totally misread your comment. Whew!
It will be attacked
If it’s not then it’s not living up to the Star Trek name IMO!
Dang the musical episode was a major highlight for me 🤷♂️
Pixel doesn’t have eink screen though which is kind of the whole point
I am glad I had the advanced wisdom and intellect to recognize and correct for the error.
The LinkedIn-styled writing here is hard for me to get through, but I think the general gist is that for profit platforms are easier to onboard which I agree with. This line stands out:
And what do we get in return? A worse experience than cloud-based services.
I have to disagree somewhat, it’s a different experience that is absolutely more difficult in many ways, but for those of us who value privacy, control over our data, and don’t like ads, the trade-off is worth it. Also it goes without saying that the usability of selfhosted apps has exploded in the past few years and it will likely become less and less of an issue.
So to make a bluesky with (for example) two users is available for anyone to create at any time, but is so extremely technically intensive that absolutely nobody besides the one company is capable of doing it? You don’t find that the slightest bit odd? I think the open source and decentralized claimes are straight up lies.